Client consultation

What clients say

Accounts from those we have worked with

Pension disputes are personal matters. Below are accounts from clients who have engaged Mekhala Chambers across various stages of their situations.

Back to Home

8+

Years of practice

340+

Clients assisted

4.8

Average client rating

3

Registered practitioners

Client accounts

What clients have shared with us

RK

Robert Kavanagh

British expat, Bangkok — April 2025

I had received a formal demand from the Social Security Office that I did not understand — the document was in Thai and the translation I arranged was unclear. Nattaya reviewed the matter quickly and produced a response letter that addressed the specific points raised. More helpfully, she included a short note explaining what the letter was doing and why. That note was something I had not expected but found very reassuring.

SP

Suda Phongphanit

Retired, Nonthaburi — March 2025

My pension entitlement was reduced following a decision I did not agree with, and I did not know how to respond. The settlement support service was what I used. The process took several weeks longer than I had hoped, but the practitioner kept me informed throughout. We reached an outcome that, while not everything I had asked for, was better than what the original decision stated.

MT

Marcus Thorne

Australian national, Chiang Mai (case handled remotely) — April 2025

What I valued most was that no one ever pushed me to escalate. I started with just the letter service to see how the authority responded. When it became clear that a negotiated resolution was not going to be possible, I chose to proceed further — but that was my decision, not something that was suggested to me as a way of generating more fees.

WN

Wanpen Nakorn

Former civil service employee, Bangkok — April 2025

The tribunal representation was thorough. Pracha explained the process at every stage and made sure I understood what would happen on the hearing day. I had never attended a tribunal before and the preparation we did beforehand meant I was not caught off guard by anything. The outcome was positive, though I was told from the beginning not to assume anything before the decision came.

JL

James Lindqvist

Swedish resident, Bangkok — May 2025

I appreciated that the first conversation was genuinely exploratory. I was not being sold to. The practitioner told me honestly that the letter service might not resolve my matter and explained the risks of each path. That kind of candour is not what I expected from a legal office, and it was why I decided to proceed with them.

AC

Achara Chanpradit

Private sector retiree, Samut Prakan — March 2025

Siriporn helped me draft my initial inquiry about a delayed pension payment. The letter was well-written and professional. I did not need to go further — the SSO responded within three weeks and the matter resolved. For the fee, I felt I received fair value. I would return if a more complex issue arose.

Illustrative case summaries

How matters have unfolded

The following are anonymised summaries based on representative matters. Client identifying details have been altered.

Case Summary A — Demand Response & Early Resolution

Letter Drafting Service — Duration: 5 weeks

The Situation

An international client employed in Thailand for 12 years received a formal repayment demand from the Social Security Office claiming an overpayment of benefits. The client disputed the calculation but did not know how to respond formally in Thai.

The Approach

Mekhala Chambers reviewed the original demand, identified two factual errors in the authority's calculation, and drafted a formal response requesting reconsideration. A strategy note was provided to the client before submission.

The Outcome

The Social Security Office reviewed its calculation and issued a revised notice reducing the repayment amount by approximately 60%. No further proceedings were required. The matter concluded within the letter drafting service scope.

"I had assumed this would take months and require far more involvement from me. It was considerably more straightforward than I had feared." — Client A

Case Summary B — Negotiated Settlement of Entitlement Dispute

Settlement Support Service — Duration: approximately 3 months

The Situation

A Thai national retired after 28 years of Social Security contributions was informed that a portion of her contribution period was not recognised due to a change in employer registration records. This reduced her calculated pension entitlement materially.

The Approach

Mekhala Chambers gathered employment records from the period in question, engaged in informal discussions with the SSO regarding the registration discrepancy, and attended a mediation session on behalf of the client. A settlement proposal was drafted reflecting the evidence gathered.

The Outcome

A settlement was agreed that recognised 18 of the 24 disputed months of contribution. While the full period was not restored, the client chose to accept the settlement rather than proceed to tribunal, having been advised of the time and cost involved.

"I was told from the start that a full outcome could not be assured. The partial recognition was better than nothing, and I was informed at every stage." — Client B

Reach us

Contact Mekhala Chambers

Address

88 Sathorn Road, Silom, Bangkok 10500

Hours

Mon–Fri 9:00–17:30
Sat by appointment

Add your own account

Ready to discuss your pension matter?

An initial conversation is always without charge. We will listen carefully and tell you honestly whether and how Mekhala Chambers can assist.

Book a Consultation